Sun. Sep 27th, 2020

Supporting Farmers

5 socio-cultural constraints to poultry development

3 min read

A sociological appraisal is essential in determining strategies for development. Technical and economic appraisals are also necessary, but are insufficient on their own.
Socio-cultural factors contribute to the wide variety of response of livestock keepers even under identical economic conditions. Many socio-cultural factors affect livestock production.
Below are a few effects that I have found out for you to avoid or change if you can.
Perception of species
For example, some communities ban ducks, as they are presumed dirty and destructive to drinking water supplies. Some communities regard pigeons as a sign of peace and concord. In such communities, the presence of pigeons is regarded as a good omen, and their departure would presage disaster.
In other communities, pigeons are regarded as an evil omen, since they are used by native doctors in sinister rituals.
Also read:
Is what you feed your poultry too much or insufficient?
How to increase production by use of nesting in chicken
How to build a poultry house | Ventilation
Photo based crop insurance could debut in Kenya in 2019
KALRO launches apps to assist farmers,Kenya
Ceremonial use of poultry
The value placed upon poultry for use at ceremonies and festivals or even as a source of income in times of need but not as a source of daily food nor as a regular source of income.
Some regard chickens as their pets or part of the family, thus it is only the arrival of an important unexpected visitor that could allow their use as food, although they can be sold without regret and the money utilized.
High value placed on crop production
Another major constraint to poultry production is the high value placed upon crop production rather than livestock production. This affects the willingness to put much time, expense and effort into livestock production.
Flock theft
Theft is also a great constraint. Villagers who have lost all their poultry to theft may be reluctant to face the expense of starting again.
Livestock ownership
The social norm that determines ownership of livestock. Typically, where crop farming is the men’s main activity, keeping livestock is perceived as a peripheral activity relegated to women and children. However, when the number of livestock increases, men usually take over the activity.
It should not be assumed that socio-cultural factors can be changed. However, by incorporating socio-cultural factors into development strategies, the programmes and technologies may encounter less resistance. Development programmes, which combine local knowledge with western science, yield strategies which are culturally more acceptable.
Sociocultural factors are thus not seen as a problem, but rather as a factor to be considered or used in finding a solution.
Like and follow @MkulimaTODAY facebook|twitter|instagram|pinterestt share this article and leave a comment

8 thoughts on “5 socio-cultural constraints to poultry development

  1. We’re a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our
    community. Your website offered us with valuable info to work on. You have done an impressive job and our whole
    community will be grateful to you.

  2. I have been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It is pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet
    will be much more useful than ever before.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *